We have a couple of generation of women who are extremely angry. They’re angry at men because intuitively they realize they had been interfered with by a male intellect. There are a lot of women who are unwilling to condescend you might say to nurturing a child, who if they get pregnant will put that child right into a daycare center as soon as possible.

One of the tragedies of this whole thing has been the change of characteristic within women themselves which no one is aware of and would be terribly bad political talk at this stage, but we have really a couple of generation of women who are extremely angry. They’re angry at men because intuitively they realize they had been interfered with by a male intellect. And a lot of women who are unwilling to in any way condescend you might say to nurturing a child and who if they get pregnant will put that child right into a daycare center and so on.

The way of bringing about some change in that probably with all the vested interest and since we’re dealing with extremely powerful forces, it’s probably not possible on a large statistical level. I look at this period of history from the scientific term which is taken from the Greeks a “stocasism.” Nature operates by mass profusion with a high degree of intent which is very selective. Nature will produce seven million eggs on the female ovary at birth, they’re all there complete, in hopes of getting two or three of them through the net, produces quintillions of male sperm. Why? Because nature’s abundant in the creative process. Anything is cheap. And if six of them hit target, fine, you know, out of quintillions of them, quintillions, literally that high a number.

Now, we find that when situations start radically breaking down, one of the first things is we have a rapid population increase. Any time nature’s agenda starts being interfered with there’s a rapid population increase. Simply nature steps up the stochastic process. This is seemingly very cool. When I first began to realize this is how nature operated I was terrified with it. It scared me to death and then I felt a great bitterness and resentment about it. I didn’t like it. But by in large what we have to look for here now is not the broad mass to suddenly overnight in time undergo a radical change because the damage is too deep. But I’m always hoping that simply we will appeal to enough people that enough people will undergo the necessary steps, that you’ll have a nucleus who can maintain the system when the rest of the system starts disintegrating. 

I think of there again of Ilya Prigogine’s dissipated structures and then when a coherent structure hits a certain point of disequilibrium it doesn’t take much energy to bring it in order out of its chaos. In other words if it were a large scale stable system it takes an enormous energy to bring about change. Probably we’ll have to wait until this instability hits a certain peak but then we must have some prepared people and it isn’t they’re going to rush out and physically manipulate the whole situation. It’s simply that their presence will furnish what we call the chaotic attracter to bring a new order out of the chaos. And that sounds very grandiose but I think it’s extremely practical. So I think that we do know. It’s like the A student as the model for the Bell Curve in the classroom. You see by having that A student there that we can all focus on we can maintain the stability of the system. But you can’t make every student an A student and you’re not going to bring every person around to this way of thinking.  All we can do is appear and it will take probably a higher intellectual circle of people. 

There’s a certain elitism here, I’m afraid, but we’ve got to look at it totally head on. When I hear the talk about population control and I’ve heard an argument from a religious person not long back that all of our current ways of trying to control the population was so bad that what we had to do was elevate their sexual appreciation to a very high level and make them aware of the sacredness of the procreative act so that they would enter into it from an entirely different level and then I would go out and I would see some of our lesser informed citizens and I would think of what would happen if you approach them from that standpoint. Of course it’s ludicrous. You don’t stand a chance of anything like that. The only appeal we can make here is to probably and enlightened portion of our population.