| |

Touch the Future is more an evolution
of insights than events. Perhaps it is a single insight, with different
facets unfolding at different times.
The way adults Touch the Future exploded into view with
the homebirth of my second son, John-Michael. Suddenly he was there,
looking up. Waves of deep affection filled the room. I could see,
reflected in this first glance, that his life would be deeply influenced
by my strengths and by my limitations. He was watching, learning.
Our relationship, more precisely, my relationship to everything,
including him, would be his teaching. The focus suddenly shifted
from controlling or shaping his behavior to uplifting my own.
The challenge was to become or model the best I could be rather
than reward or punish his behavior. I would help open and
develop his unique gifts and he mine. Embarking on this most remarkable
journey, I knew that trust, respect and deep affection would be
our guide. That was June of 1986.
In the East they speak of a state of mind or relationship, which
is awake, attentive, fully present, where complete attention is
given to what is. In this state, perception acts,
deeply, authentically and with great intelligence. Athletes call
this state of undivided attention the zone. In the zone,
our response is not clouded by opinions, judgments or self-defense.
For my wife, childbirth was a zone or flow experience. Now, John-Michael
and I shared this state. Clearly this new human being would touch
my life as much as I his. Could this wakefulness, with its deep
trust and respect, become the center of our relationship? Could
anything be more important than the sanctity of this first and most
important relationship? Years later he is still watching, still
learning.
In the late 70s, while filming a documentary on the nature
of intelligence, I happened to meet David Bohm, a protégé of Einstein.
I didnt know it then, but David was one of our most visionary
theoretical physicists. Quantum physics reveals that we, and the
physical universe, are varying patterns or fields of energy. Bohm
believed this energy was in someway conscious and intelligent. Fields
are not localized like tables and chairs. The information or meaning
implicit in these fields is everywhere, always.
Also in the 70s I happened upon a book, Psychic Discoveries
Behind the Iron Curtain. The Soviets had been investigating
extra sensory perception, as did the CIA, for its potential use in
counter intelligence. The book described separating a litter of
rabbits from their mother, who was being monitored in a laboratory.
The babies were taken in a submarine to the bottom of the Black
Sea and slaughtered one at a time. The moment of death for each
baby was later matched with spikes in the mothers brain and
heart waves with precise colorations. This is a field affect, a
subtle connection, which is not dependent on time or space. If a
rabbits brain is sensitive enough to register such affects,
imagine how sensitive our human heart/mind may be. For years, my
wife and I had shared some of these non-localized affects. John-Michael
was an expression of our energy; so obviously he too was participating
in our experience, our fields, outwardly through his five senses
and inwardly through what we might call intuition.
This intuitive force is strong in young children. They learn from
it. It guides them, as much, if not more than the information gathered
from their physical senses. Most adults miss this subtle resonance
completely.
The state of the adult, their local and non-localized fields, have
meaning and represent vital information, especially for the early
child. The feeling or meaning of the adults changing states
resonate in these subtle fields, which expresses in the child as
intuition or feelings. Most importantly, this inner, non-verbal
knowing, provides the context or filter which gives order to the
childs experience. When the inner state of the adult changes,
so does the context for what the child learns. Simply stated, the
state of the adult has a strong influence on what the child actually
learns. For the early child, the quality of these first, primary
relationships establishes patterns of perception and behavior which
last a lifetime. The essential insight, which later became the core
of Touch the Future, is that the state of the adult, in relationship,
is infinity more important than the information or skills we so
urgently wish to convey or teach. State
or relationship is primary and impacts learning, performance and
wellness.
I saw in myself and others that adults often mistakenly give all
their attention to teaching the child how to kick the
ball, read the sentence, take his or her first step, and ignoring
the actual state of their relationship. The real learning, that
which leaves permanent marks, is our inner state as this outer, so-called
teaching, is taking place. By optimizing our inner experience
we open the possibility of slipping naturally into Optimum Learning
Relationship, a state which frees energy and attention from
self-defense, and therefore dramatically improves how we learn,
perform and feel.
David Bohm and later Joseph Chilton Pearce described research showing
how our physical, emotional and intellectual states
are woven into each memory, now referred to as state specific
learning. To remember is to reconstruct images of the physical,
emotional and intellectual states involved in the original experience.
Adults, especially males, give greatest attention to their intellectual
images and often neglect those created by the body and emotions.
The early child, relying almost exclusively on somatic and emotional
intelligences, learns more in the first few years than they will
the rest of their lives. There is a huge gap between what is actually
taking place in the child, emotionally and physically, and what
most adults think is happening.
Basic trust, belonging and feeling safe are perhaps the simplest
way to describe this inner knowing of the early child. When safe,
even in a highly challenging environment, learning and growth unfolds
exponentially. Betray this need for basic trust early in a childs
life, and we all pay a heavy price. In 1981 Pat, a female friend,
was training for the 1984 Olympics. On Tuesday evening, at 9:30pm a stranger
slipped through an unlocked window of her apartment. Wearing a mask
and pressing a knife to her throat, he described stalking her for
weeks. He knew when she went to the gym, who her friends were, where
she shopped. For three hours he beat and threatened to rape and
kill her. When the assailant placed the weapon on the nightstand,
Pat grabbed the knife, pushed the rapist to the floor and chased
him out of her home.
Sexual violence had never touched my life so closely. Why would
a man do such a thing? I had to know. For the next two years I reached
out to over fifty rape crisis centers, district attorneys, victims,
assailants and forensic psychiatrists. Slowly a critical piece of
human development locked into place. Pats assailant had been
betrayed very early in his life.
Years ago Ashley Montagu, a friend to Touch the Future, published
The Natural Superiority of Women. The biological superiority
of females obviously implies that males are more vulnerable and
are so from the moment of conception. Research shows that the male
fetus is at greater risk of death and damage. By the time a baby
is born boys are 4 to 6 weeks less developed than girls. Boys face
more psychological problems in early childhood. They require more
attention, making them more vulnerable to poor parental care. Girls
outperform boys at school. The disadvantages of being male are compounded
by the cultural norm of treating them as more resilient than girls.
Suicides are three times as common among males than females. Rape,
domestic violence, many forms of child abuse, addiction, depression
often begin when a boys essential need to feel safe, wanted
and cared for is betrayed by significant adults early in his life.
The opposite of this Betrayal of Intimacy is equally true.
Nurturing the early child, girls and boys, will prevent much of
the violence we experience throughout the world and the research
supports this very clearly. It was so simple.
Violence was epidemic in the 80s, gangs, drive-by's, and campus
slayings. Teen pregnancies were on the rise. More single parents
were seeking early and extended daycare. Original play was being
replaced by television and by often violent computer games. The
direct, intimate contact between parents and young children, the
antidote for many adult patterns of abuse and addiction, was rare.
Mothers of young children were the fastest growing segment of the
workplace. In so many ways we were moving in the wrong direction.
The consequences were chilling. Again and again the importance of
bonding and basic trust took center stage.
Building upon these insights, I proposed a five part PBS series
called Touch the Future. In packaging the proposal I invited fifty
leading researchers to serve as advisors. All but two responded
with great enthusiasm. Later it became clear that the themes developed
by the series would challenge the values and policies of every major
institution, health care, education, corporate America, childcare,
media, the computer industry, etc. The series was not funded. Rebounding
in 1993, Touch the Future became a 501c3, nonprofit educational
organization. Our first step was publishing a newsletter featuring
David Bohm on Knowledge & Insight. Three copies of this first
edition were sent to twenty-five colleagues and close friends with
a request that they forward the two additional copies to two other
friends. Our current mailing list evolved in this very personal
way.
In the mid 90s a new question arose, one as compelling as
the issue of violence. Why do people with equal talent perform differently
under pressure? Why do some thrive and others collapse?
In 1981 Joseph Chilton Pearce wrote about playful insight
in his book Bond of Power where he explored the critical relationship
of bonding, play, learning and insight. Also in 1981 Ashley Montagu
published Growing Young, The Genius Of Childhood Recaptured.
The focus of this work was also our playful nature. In 1987 David
Bohm described, in Science, Order and Creativity, the role
of authentic play as the foundation for true intelligence and insight.
In 1990 Mihaly Csiksentmihalyi wrote Flow, The Psychology of
Optimal Experience where he described the complete attention,
a characteristic of original play, found in those performing at
their best. In a rich and varied ways, their descriptions parallel
that of O. Fred Donaldson, a play researcher who had spent the past
twenty years playing with special needs children and wild animals.
I discovered that original play was natures medium for real
learning and development. The prerequisite for play is feeling
safe - back to bonding and belonging.
Touch the Futures goal is to reduce the resistance to learning,
performance and wellness often found in adult relationships with
children. Together these insights reinforced the importance of what
we call bonding, belonging, nurturing, basic trust, all functions
of relationship rather than content we give so much attention to.
I discovered that the relationship is the content and the
connection, the bond, is the channel of communication. When the
state is undivided and the bond safe, there is nothing that cannot
be learned or accomplished. Growth becomes defensive rather than
expansive if the state, the bond, is fragmented, or in conflict.
We Touch the Future through our relationships with children. Our
relationship provides the context for every learning opportunity
and therefore is the content, especially for the early child. For
the early child this context is often experienced as a feeling or
subtle sense of safety or dis-ease. What the early child learns
and remembers is the relationship, much more than the skills or
concepts we wish to teach them.
By appreciating the primacy of state over content our
attention shifts, and with it, the resonate field we call relationship
also changes. Learning becomes relationship and our relationships
become the learning. The resistance to learning, peak performance
and wellness many of us feel, fades, leading naturally to Optimum
Learning Relationships. Optimum becomes easy, the miraculous
natural when our self-imposed resistance, or that imposed by others,
is replaced by undreamed of possibilities. In this state we welcome
the unexpected with joy, affection, and great respect.
|