violence

beyond reason

We are attracted to experiences that feel good and turn away from those that hurt, pleasure and pain. Both are driven by millions of years of natural intelligence.

Affectionate touch, eyes that assure care and trust, warm cuddling, the life giving sensation of mother’s breast, being held when frightened, all the experiences we call nurturing involve pleasure. Like a beautiful flower, delicate and radiating, the female body percolates with pleasurable possibilities. Life’s continuity depends on pleasure. See Sex At Dawn.

Puberty transforms pleasure into reproductive sexuality, still deeply rooted in nurturing, but with a twist. The game changes. Clearly the enchantment of female pleasure is something few males can resist, which is, after all, nature’s intelligent design.

Being the source of pleasure the value and importance of the female body’s pleasure potential increases, at least in the often sensory deprived male imagination. Anything that valuable, like gold, becomes a commodity to be possessed and controlled. Doing so brings social power. The stakes are indeed high.

Anything that brings pleasure, whether it is substances or sex - individuals, governments and political-religious organizations step up to the gaming table and play their controlling hand. They make up rules, pass laws, boast of divine revelation, and have for centuries to possess and control - pleasure.

It is well know, to control one’s currency is to control its people, and controlling pleasure, in this regard, is worth its weight on gold. Ask the Mafia, similar in the way it profits from pleasure as the church and governments. No? Just glance at the 300 year Catholic Spanish Inquisition with its witch hunts and how many of its torturous techniques were sadistic sexual pervasions.

One of the easiest ways to control the enchantment and political power of pleasure, and therefore entire populations, is to reduce its potency. Locate the most sensitive pleasure producing tissues and remove it, claiming of course that an old bearded man seated on his cloud throne demanded so. Do this over and over and like any Big Lie (referring to Joseph Goebbels’s the German Reich Minister of Propaganda famous remark), becomes the truth.

Like Shakespeare’s ‘rose’ a lie, be it by the church, the government, Fox or the Wall Street Journal, is still a lie. It is well documented. Female and male circumcision was invented to reduce and therefore control pleasure and this unnatural and completely unnecessary procedure is forced. Like hooded prisoners at Guantanamo or the Inquisition, young girls and boys by the millions are held down by force, their legs spread and the most sensitive tissues, that nature evolved over millions of years is cut off, in most cases inflecting unbearable pain.

James W. Prescott, PhD, argues that circumcision, female and male, is a form or torture, illegal, demanding equal protection under 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. Jim cites The General Assembly of the United Nations on December 10, 1948 that adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, specifically Article 5: "No one shall be subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

Jim’s position is clear and lucid as the arguments raised by Joseph Chilton Pearce in The Death of Religion and Rebirth of Spirit, and by Sam Harris in End of Faith, both startling analyses of the clash of faith and reason in the modern world.

Pleasure is not nearly as demonic as is the behavior of those who seek power by controlling and profiting from it.

See more…

Michael Mendizza

All Genital Mutilations Are Torture

Posted Wed, 08/17/2011 by James Prescott

prescott circ

It is not my personal feelings.
Empirically, scientifically, all genital mutilations are torture and are affirmed as such by the "equal protection clause" of the 14th Amendment. This important 'equal protection clause' is not being equally applied. Genital mutilation is a crime when applied to females but not to males, and this discrepancy is not being recognized by the Genital Integrity Movement.

It is not so clear that this failure to recognize the relevance of the 14th Amendment to genital mutilation can be found in the sensory deprivation model for violence and the theistic religious foundations that support genital mutilation that was opposed by the early Christians.

My cause is placed in the The General Assembly of the United Nations on December 10, 1948 that adopted and proclaimed the UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS;
specifically; Article 5 of said Declaration affirms that: "NO ONE SHALL BE SUBJECTED TO TORTURE OR TO CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT;

and the U.N. CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD (November 20 1989)
* ARTICLE 37. TORTURE, CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY, which states that States Parties shall ensure that:
a) No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

This fundamental foundation has been abandoned by the Genital Integrity Movement, which is evidenced by its complete absence in their various testimonials opposing circumcision; and in Georganne Chapin's rejection of this history in her testimony and in her communication to WHO Director General Dr. Chan.

See attached.

James W. Prescott, PhD

 

memorial day 2011

 

For my sons, Memorial Day 2011

God Bless America blared from the flag waving Harley as boy scouts, soon to be men, marched between white lines. Memorial Day, a national glance inward to mourn the lives mangled and lost ‘serving’ freedom and civic liberty. I almost wept, not out of patriotic duty and honor but for the deep feeling of shame and betrayal that this and past pageants endure.

While I honor the ultimate sacrifice brothers and sisters have made through the ages, some urgent, some heroic and necessary, so many lives, however, have been mangled for reasons – that had they known – they would have wept too.

Responding to Touch the Future and National Institute for PLAY’s important PLAY SCIENCE DVD:

Creative play is the foundation for social-political freedom and liberty which is not possible when abnormal brain development is induces by a failure of affcctional bonding in the maternal-infant –child relationship.

Depression, stereotypical rocking behaviors and compulsive stimulus-seeking behaviors, all produced by sensory deprivation to the developing brain that is induced by failed maternal-infant/child affectional bonding, robs the developing offspring of the capacity to engage in touching and body movement that is essential for creative/spontaneous play; and to later development of behaviors associated with personal freedom and liberty.

Violence, particularly child abuse, is another destructive consequence of these early life experiences that prevents the development of creative/spontaneous play, which is the foundation for social-political freedom and liberty.

Figure 1, a photo montage, illustrates the pathological emotional behaviors induced by early
deprivation of physical affection. Figure

2 illustrates the avoidance of physical contact with other animals and humans in mother-deprived monkeys; and positive affectional behaviors in monkeys reared with their mothers.

Table 1 presents how our Two Cultural Brains are formedby Pain and Pleasure, which determines the kind of Culture we become.

Explore the full essay

13 February 2011

Hi Jim,
Just want to make sure you saw this study by http://linlab.med.nyu.edu/members.html Dayu Lin at New York University that corroborates your own studies and the work you have been doing for over four decades. Here is the Nature summary of the study: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v470/n7333/full/nature09736.html

Excerpt:
Immediate early gene analysis and single unit recordings from VMHvl during social interactions reveal overlapping but distinct neuronal subpopulations involved in fighting and mating. Neurons activated during attack are inhibited during mating, suggesting a potential neural substrate for competition between these opponent social behaviours.

"The mating circuit acts like a gate on the aggression circuit and actively suppresses nearby fighting neurons when there is a potential mate around," says Lin.

Peace through pleasure
Susan M. Block, Ph.D.

Thanks Susan for the reference. The reciprocal inhibitory relationship between Pain and Pleasure and Peace and Violence have been known for a long time. It is great to know that “mating circuits” actively suppress “nearby fighting neurons” in the mouse brain.

The scientific history of this relationship goes back to the 1950s with the studies of Robert G. Heath, M.D., Sc.D. at Columbia University and continued as Chairman, Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Tulane University Medical School. His edited 1964 textbook The Role of Pleasure In Behavior is a classic in the field.

More
James W. Prescott, Ph.D.

The essay on my BLOG, titled Sarah Palin Stokes The Fire Of The U.S. Culture of Violence describes how the dimension of Political Conservatism becomes aligned with Violence and Political Liberalism with Non-Violence. http://ttfuture.org/blog/1181 and at
http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/Palin_Culture_of_Violence_1.10.11.pdf

Paul Krugman has noted that there are Two Public Moralities, which reflect the Two Americas that have existed since the days of our Founding Fathers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/14/opinion/14krugman.html?pagewanted=print

These Two Public Moralities are rooted in the Pain and Pleasure experiences that form the biopsychological forces that have polarized humanity ever since the beginning of the evolution of Homo sapiens. It was Pythagoras (c.582-c.507 B.C.) who provided the sex gender equivalents of Morality: maleness with goodness; and femaleness with evil:

“There is a good principle which has created order, light and man; and a bad principle which has created chaos, darkness and woman.”[Quoted in Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 2010/1953]. Women have been equated with evil in this formulation of good and evil, which has cast a violent cloud upon humanity over the past several millennia (Prescott, 1995).

How culture answers the question: “What is the morality of pain and pleasure in human relationships” determines the life path of Peace or Violence that will be followed. Pain and Pleasure are in reciprocal inhibitory relationship with one another and provide the biological substrate for the polarization of humanity.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/truthseeker/genpl.html

These relationships are discussed in my BLOG, particularly how the Approval of Violence and the Rejection of Pleasure in Human Relationships define Political Conservatism. 

 Click HERE For Extended Commentary

James W. Prescott, Ph.D.
Institute of Humanistic Science

America is a Culture of Violence. Assassination of our political leaders has a long
history in this nation. Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Martin
Luther King, Jr. are in recent memory of this history and now we must add liberal
Democratic Representative Gabrielle Gifford, 8th District, Arizona, as a potential victim.
It is of more than passing interest that the victims of these assassinations represent the
liberal wing of America political thought and action. Questions must be raised as to the
origins of political/social conservatism in the genesis of these assassinations. On the
world scene we have Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Benito Mussolini, Emperor Hirohito and
the variety of dictators throughout Latin America, Asia, Africa and the Middle East—all
strove to subject “We, the People” to government tyranny.

An “agonizing reappraisal” is needed to evaluate why homo sapiens is the most violent
and destructive primate on this planet; why religious warfare has dominated the socialpolitical
landscape of home sapiens; why “liberals” are rarely assassins which is
occupied primarily by those of authoritarian/conservative social/political ideology.
In pursing the investigation of the attempted assassination of Representative Gifford we
need to ask why her and not Republican Senator Jon Kyle of Arizona, a far more
significant and powerful political conservative figure than liberal Democrat
Representative Gifford, was not targeted for assassination.
Full Text Found HERE

It is matter of record that Sarah Palin has evoked many images, verbal rhetoric and
graphic visual imagery of violence in her political speeches and campaigns. Her use of
the Crosshairs against her political opponents that is represented in the following
Figure 1 that targets liberal political Districts are illustrative of this effort. Crosshairs
mean one thing—to kill- and the next step is pulling the trigger. This use of violent words
and visual imagery can only stoke the fire of violent political opposition, which we see in
the attempted assassination of Representative Gifford, one of the Districts targeted for
assassination.

E. J. Dionne Jr., in a Washington Post Op-Ed piece (1.10.11), quoted Representative
Giffords: "We're on Sarah Palin's targeted list," she said, "but the thing is that the way
she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do
that, they've got to realize there's consequences to that action." That consequence was
pulling the trigger.

“Mother Grizzly” is another example of the use of violent imagery in conveying a political
message by Sarah Palin.

MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS
A Washington Post story (1.9.11) on the shooting reported: “On YouTube, Loughner's
profile listed Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels's "The Communist Manifesto" and Adolf
Hitler's "Mein Kampf" among his favorite books”, which provides an obvious motivational
linkage for the shooter in Tucson, AZ, via the neocortical cognitive brain.

There are, however, other motivational factors that are rooted in early life experiences of
infancy, childhood and adolescence, which form the subcortical emotional, social,
sexual brain that is first in evolution and development, which need to be investigated.

Studies have documented that nurturing; non-violent tribal cultures are characterized by
high maternal-infant/child affectional bonding with support of sexual affectional
relationships in youth and are predominately matrilineal/matrilocal in nature. The
opposite non-nurturing relationships were found to characterize the violent, warfare
cultures that were predominately patrilineal/patrilocal cultures.

Violence and Pleasure Profiles
The reciprocal relationship of violence and pleasure holds true in modern industrial
nations as well as primitive societies. This theory was tested by means of a
questionnaire given to 96 college students (average age: 19). The results showed that
students who have relatively negative attitudes toward sexual pleasure tend to favor
harsh punishment for children and to believe that violence is necessary to solve
problems. The students rated a series of statements on a scale of 1 to 6, where 1
indicated strong agreement and 6 strong disagreement. Through a statistical technique
(factor analysis), a personality profile of the violent person was developed. Table 5
(from Prescott, J.W. (1975) Body Pleasure and the Origins of Violence) shows the
degree of relationship among the various statements, which reflect social and moral
values. The figures at left, known as 'loadings,' are treated like correlation coefficients.
They indicate the strength that each variable contributes to the overall personality profile
of the respondents. Values range from -1.0 to +1.0.

It can be seen that Political Conservatism has a loading of .82, which defines this
Factor 1, and accounts for 66.6% of the common relationships in this questionnaire. If
you Agree with one statement you are likely to agree with the other statements on this
questionnaire with the probability associated with the numeric figure on the left.
Similarly, for Disagreement.

This Profile has grouped the Questions into four categories: 1) Violence Approved; 2)
Physical Pleasure Condemned; 4) Alcohol and Drugs Rated Higher Than Sex; and 4)
Political Conservatism.

This Prescott Index of Conservatism can be completed by Sarah Palin and all Politicians
to determine the accuracy of this Profile of Political Conservatism and the moral
values that give it structure and function.

Political Conservatism and Liberalism is more than just a neocortical cognitive event but
whose structure and function is deeply rooted in early life experiences of Pain and
Pleasure that form the developing brain for Peace or Violence. Table 2 summarizes our
Two Cultural Brains that are formed by whether Pain or Pleasure is encoded in the
subcortical Limbic-Emotional-Social-Sexual Brain and the Neocortical Cognitive
Thinking Brain during early development—the formative periods of brain-behavioral
development.

America has created its own “Culture of Violence”, which has its many roots that are
shared by the Cultures of the World. The time is long overdue to transform our Cultures
of Violence into Cultures of Peace. Calls for civility and Words alone cannot resolve
millennia of violence that the history of human violence and treaties affirms.

References
Dionne Jr, E.J. (2011). Gabby Giffords, a tragic prophet. The Washington Post.
January 10. Washington, D.C.

Fahrenthold, D.A. and Williams, C. (2011). 22-year-0ld suspect appears to have left
trail of bizarre Internet postings. The Washington Post. 9 January, Washington
D.C.

Prescott, J.W. (1975) Body Pleasure and the Origins of Violence. The Futurist April.
Reprinted: The Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists (1975) November.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/bulletin/article.html

Prescott, J.W. (l979): Deprivation of physical affection as a primary process in the
development of physical violence. In. Child Abuse and Violence (Gil, D. G.,
Ed). AMS Press New York pp 66-137.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/IM_BF_H.pdf

Prescott, J.W. (1989). Profiles of Affectionate (Peaceful) v Non-Affectionate (Violent)
Tribal Cultures. The Truth Seeker July/August.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/Profiles_Peaceful_v_Violent.pdf

Prescott, J.W. (l990): Affectional bonding for the prevention of violent behaviors:
Neurobiological, Psychological and Religious/Spiritual Determinants. In. Violent
Behavior Vol. I: Assessment and Intervention. (L.J. Hertzberg, et. al., Eds).
PMA Publishing NY pp. 110-142.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/Violent_Behavior_1990.pdf

Prescott, J.W. (1995). Violence Against Women: Philosophical and Religious
Foundations of Gender Morality. New Perspectives. (March/April). Hemet,
CA http://www.violence.de/prescott/women/article.html

Prescott, J.W. (1996). The Origins of Human Love and Viole
http://www.violence.de/prescott/pppj/article.html

Prescott, J.W. (2001). Along the Evolutionary Biological Trail. Book Review: Mother
Nature: A History of Mothers, Infants, and Natural Selection (S.H. Hrdy).
Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health 15(3): 225- 232.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/reviews/hrdy.html

Prescott, J.W. (2001). Only More Mother-Infant Bonding Can Prevent Cycles of
Violence. Cerebrum 3(1) Winter. Lt.Ed (re, Teicher, M.R.: Wounds That Time
Won't Heal: The Neurobiology of Child Abuse, Cerebrum, 2001 3(1).
http://www.violence.de/prescott/reviews/cerebrum.doc

Prescott, J.W. (2002). How Culture Shapes The Developing Brain and The Future of
Humanity. Touch the Future Newsletter. Spring Prescott, J.W. (2003).
http://www.violence.de/prescott/ttf/cultbrain.pdf

Prescott (2003). Our Two Cultural Brains: Neurointegrative and
Neurodissociative Formed By Pain and Pleasure From Early Life Experiences
Encoded in the Developing Brain.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/Our_Two_Cultural_Brains.pdf

Prescott, J.W. (2005): Prevention Or Therapy And The Politics of Trust: Inspiring a New
Human Agenda. Psychotherapy and Politics International. 3(3): 194-211 John
Wiley & Sons.
http:/www.interscience.wiley.com http://www.violence.de/prescott/politicsrust.
pdf
Prescott, J.W. (2010). Genital Mutilation of Children Is Torture. E-letter to the American
Academy of Pediatrics protesting the position of the AAP Committee On
Bioethics that supported female genital cutting (FGC) 29 April.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/eletters/peds.2010-0187v1#50189
Prescott, J.W. (2010). Infant/child homicide, breastfeeding bonding and parental care.
E-mail letter to American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statement on Child
Fatality Review: Investigation and Review of Unexpected Infant and Child
Deaths 22 September 2010 Pediatrics 104: 1158-1160
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org//cgi/content/abstract/126/3/592


10 January 2011

See Attached PDF for Tables and addational references.

It is amazing that it takes an assassination and senseless mass murder to rile tolerant people. What follows are excerpts from today’s Climate of Hate by New York Times op-ed columnist Paul Krugman.

As David Frum, the former Bush speechwriter, has put it, “Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us and now we’re discovering we work for Fox.”

Please understand – if there wasn’t an egger market for violence it would not appear in the script. While in India I discovered that at least one rape in most films was mandatory. Joseph Chilton Pearce was to be a consultant on children’s TV programming until the sponsor insisted on a steady stream of violence or there would be no show! That’s show business.

Public politics, which is not at all the closed door wheeling-and-dealing that really calls the shots, has been reduced to Spectacle Theater, on par to televised wrestling. Political players MUST conform to tried and tested show business rules. The GOP knows this and plays the part media demands very well. Progressives, so called liberals, aren’t as cunning. In a Machiavellian arena whose behavior is more intelligent, more appropiate? A few causalities, even children, only sweeten the plot.

Will the Arizona massacre make our discourse less toxic? It’s really up to G.O.P. leaders. Will they accept the reality of what’s happening to America, and take a stand against eliminationist rhetoric? Or will they try to dismiss the massacre as the mere act of a deranged individual, and go on as before?

Considering the viral success of the midterm election I don’t think so. The assignation attempt and cold blooded murders will only toss more bate into the media frenzy. Violence is an integral part of popular show business.

I remembered the upsurge in political hatred after Bill Clinton’s election in 1992 — an upsurge that culminated in the Oklahoma City bombing. And you could see, just by watching the crowds at McCain-Palin rallies, that it was ready to happen again.

Last spring Politico.com reported a surge in threats against members of Congress, which were already up by 300 percent. A number of the people making those threats had a history of mental illness — but something about the current state of America has been causing far more disturbed people than before to act out their illness by threatening, or actually engaging in, political violence.

Recall Jerry Mander predicted in 1970 that rules of television would dictate the forms of government we have, and to a great extent the societies we live in.

As Clarence Dupnik, the sheriff responsible for dealing with the Arizona shootings, put it, it’s “the vitriolic rhetoric that we hear day in and day out from people in the radio business and some people in the TV business.”

Where’s that toxic rhetoric coming from? Let’s not make a false pretense of balance: it’s coming, overwhelmingly, from the right. It’s hard to imagine a Democratic member of Congress urging constituents to be “armed and dangerous” without being ostracized; but Representative Michele Bachmann, who did just that, is a rising star in the G.O.P.

See Steve Rendall | Fox News; the No. 1 Name in Murder Fantasies

Of course, the likes of Mr. Beck and Mr. O’Reilly are responding to popular demand.

See Jullan Rayfield | New Study finds Fox News Viewers Are the Most Misinformed.

Citizens of other democracies may marvel at the American psyche, at the way efforts by mildly liberal presidents to expand health coverage are met with cries of tyranny and talk of armed resistance… and there’s a market for anyone willing to stoke that anger.

See William Rivers Pitt | The Wrath of Fools: An Open Letter to the Far Right

There is no business like show business.

Michael Mendizza

What follows connects the dots between a recent interview with Jerry Mander, activist and author of The Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television, today’s assassination attempt and a discussion on how politics have changed with Senior California Senator John Vasconcellos.

OK… Here we go.
Democratic Congresswoman Shot in Assassination Attempt
assanation giffords

 

 

 

 

 

 

"The shooting, having taken place at a public rally, appears to have been politically motivated. Quoting from the report: "Giffords herself has drawn the ire of the right, especially for her support of the healthcare bill from politicians like Sarah Palin." And "Her Tucson office was vandalized a few hours after the House vote to approve the healthcare law in March, with someone either kicking or shooting out a glass door and window."

This is not a coincidence or random act. It was predictable. Hate-radio has been building ever since Regan and Clinton deregulated the public air waves – unleashing the most sophisticated, well funded, researched, centrally controlled propaganda machine the world has ever seen and you are the target. Money and control is the goal, not fair and balanced information and a well informed democracy. Far from it!

We are so gullible, superficial, but with so much misinformation so skillfully staged it is challenging not to be. Yet another study has been released that proves that watching Fox News is detrimental to your intelligence. World Public Opinion, a project managed by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland, conducted a survey of American voters that shows that Fox News viewers are significantly more misinformed than consumers of news from other sources. What’s more, the study shows that greater exposure to Fox News increases misinformation. Interesting, the stupider we get the richer the rich become.

How many actually believe that the twin towers collapsed because of jet fuel? And, of course, mysterious building seven just fell over on its own. A recent documentary on the assassination of JFK showed audio forensic evidence of at least six bullets, not only in the president’s head but the window, the hood, nearby grass and curbs. The official Warren commission report was one crazy guy, three shots. Where did the other holes come from?

I’m a documentary film maker and have studied public media for more than forty years. I can spot a trick when I see one and there are plenty to choose from. Media is 'show business.' Images shape our world, what we think, believe and all this morphs into our identity. Once we ‘believe’ we defend it as though our life depended upon it.

Sarah Palin arrived center stage from nowhere. John McCain propped her up in a tight red dress. Media mogul Rupert Murdock pays the bill, insuring she gets all the air-time she wants, grooming not a seasoned, wise, intelligent states-woman, rather a reality TV celebrity for president.

And the current President? Transparent? Recent evidence points to him, his father and mother working for the CIA. Obama’s part is well cast. Disappointing I know but not nearly as disappointing as Obama’s betrayals during his first two years in office.

With the pulse of the work beating a Future Shock rates it is difficult to step back from the daily frenzy of sensational information and catch a bird’s eye view of what is really happening. I call this a meta-view, seeing the big picture which recasts the daily shock-and–awe events in a different perspective. Alex Jones in his well documented program The Obama Deception does this. It was sobering when released shortely after his election and even more today. Now, back to our story.

Reagan (followed by Clinton) tossed out the Fairness Doctrine back in 1981. The Fairness Doctrine was the original source of Fox’s logo, fair and balanced, Orwellian double speak. After studying what made Nazi Germany’s propaganda machine so effective, the Fairness Doctrine was put into place to prevent the same plunder from taking place in the Good Old USA.

For the best overview of how corporate-crony-media is spawning misinformation see Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

If a station broadcast one point of view, it had to be fair and balanced and offer equal time to the other. Regan tossed it out to court Christian Fundamentalists. Rush Limbaugh fired up his blasphemy the same year and like the sorcerer’s apprentices spawned others to follow. Today there are thousands of talk radio stations, and TV too, all more or less coordinated, belching out the same scripts as if their opinions were torn out of the gospels. Very entertaining, like Sunday night football 24/7. Rage and violence sells. Quiet, well informed mindfulness is boring.

Knowing this, Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s minister of propaganda (what we now call public relations) called it the big lie. It did not matter how outrageous, tell it often enough, long enough and people will claim it as the truth. Pass me another beer.

I traveled to San Francisco recently to have a chat with Jerry Mander, activist, author of many books including his first, The Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television. As the mid-term election – media circus - roared into full swing, I remembered that Jerry made a number of predictions in that, the best ever discourse on public media, what media does, who does it - to whom and why. Media would determine the kind of government we have! That was back in 1970.

I had some trouble finding Jerry’s office. You see, two weeks earlier Glenn Beck ranted that the non-profit organizations, mostly environmentalists, nestled in the Thoreau Center in San Francisco were secretly plotting to overthrow the American way of life. Beck was outraged that no one had done anything about it. A proud listener took up challenge. He packed his car with guns, explosives and ammunition and came pretty close to blowing the joint up. The media-crazed gunman was caught. Today’s twin killed several people including a nine year old girl and a judge.

Jerry and I talked about many things, reviewed the list of predictions made in The Four Arguments, on the predatory nature of corporations and the plunder of native habitat and values, about globalization, the current climate treaties, ending again with media. Jerry offered that he wrote his first book as a wake-up call, seeing firsthand the power propaganda has in the hands of corporate predators.

We are living in the belly of the beast, he said. We are swimming in sea of scripted, highly edited, censored, corporate, politically motivated, sleight-of-hand misleading information and we don’t even know it. That is what gives the beast its power. When leaving Jerry offered that he might turn his attention back to media. I hope he does.

Walking out I mused about the conversation. There were no great epiphanies, no parting of the heavens with insights. Then I smiled. Who the hell is Glenn Beck? A common circus barker on the tellie, another paid entertainer, like Reagan was most of his life, with a steady rank and file of patriotic devotees ready to murder a bunch of no good environmentalists because he says so – just like today's assassin! That was some weeks ago. I rest my case.

Last week I interviewed John Vasconcellos, thirty five plus year senator from the Silicon Valley, and arguably the most humanistic politician on the Hill. Again, after a lengthy conversation about his career, great victories and defeats, John focused on how politics had changed during the last quarter of a century, the same period the conservative propaganda machine had been expanding.

Years ago, John said, it did not matter which side of the isle you sat, Republican or Democrat, there was a challenge, we each viewed it from different perspectives and we solved it, each compromising a little, reaching consensus that was in the best interest of everyone, the people. Today, he said, politics is about identity, not issues. Today politicians identify with an ideology. They are that and defend their self-interest identity as if their life (not to mention their pocket book) depended on it.

Today images matter, not issues. As Mander predicted, media is shaping the kind of government and therefore civil life we have. As you can see from today’s assassination attempt and senseless murders, his crystal ball back in 1970 was pretty clear.

Media, television, public relations, are all image based. Glenn Beck is an image and he plays his part well. Mander and I wondered if Beck actually believes what that image is paid to play every day. We will never know. Walter Cronkite was an actor, but that was before the politically motivated opinions of talk-media changed the stage forever.

Today we can’t really be sure if what we think is based on journalism or talk (paid propaganda). Tens of thousands of viewers believed Marcus Welby, M.D., starring Robert Young, was a doctor and sent him health related questions every day.

It’s the big lie. Say it often enough, long enough and people will believe that Oswald, a paid FBI informant framed by the CIA, acting all by himself shot Kennedy. Yes, Dorothy, Glenn Beck is a wizard, and we are living in the belly of the beast but are too dull, by design, to do much about it. Or are we?

Michael Mendizza

Epilog
Gabrielle Giffords stood up for healthcare reform and against xenophobia. They shot her in the head for it. The six that died were the lucky ones. The other dozen shot will carry this day forward for the remainder of their lifetimes.

When men like John Boehner and women like Sarah Palin tell you that they are shocked and saddened by what has occurred you may well assume that they are indeed. They inspired the rampage, and they are now confronted by what they have wrought.

From Sarah Palin rally promo: 06/12/10, 10:00 AM
 
Get on Target for Victory in November
Help remove Gabrielle Giffords from office
Shoot a fully automatic M16 with Jesse Kelly"
Let this day go down in history with
Lincon-April 14, 1865,
JFK-November 22, 1963,
King-April 4, 1968 and
RFK-June 5, 1968.
Essay over.

Marc Ash, founder and director of Reader Supported News, as well as Truthout.

palain

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appreciation

Posted Fri, 11/26/2010 by michael

Appreciation is a way of life, much more than it is a holiday. Even the capacity and experience of appreciation is a profound gift. I’m sure trees and flowers in their way appreciate sun and rain. Each species shares its special reality. The experience of being human is truly one of the rarest in the living universe – and if we appreciated that, our unity and diversity each day, what a wonderful world it would be.

Pulling back from our personal obsessions with ourselves, our beliefs and cultural divisions, Arab, Jew, Christian, Republican, Progressive, Black, Native, White – pulling way back as the astronauts do in space, we would see that all that divides us really are the mental images generated from an extremely thin layer of cells on top of the brain. We are in fact all brothers and sisters, one humanity – and very, very privileged at that. And to believe otherwise, to believe that we are different, that our ideology and politics are important enough to kill for is a profound and pervasive form of insanity – a delusion that humanity has suffered from for thousands of years.

On this day of appreciation I celebrate all the wonderful spirits that have contributed to our offerings and I appreciate all that have benefited in some way form our modest efforts. Each is trying in their own way to break the same spell and meet the living world with grace, care and respect. And every moment we do, the earth and everything sharing this precious planet – rejoices.

Michael Mendizza

segan

   A friend a passed along this clip by Carl Sagan
   that illustrates the point Beautifully.

   www.youtube.com/watch?v=p86BPM1GV8M

Syndicate content