pleasure

Not Broken Don't Bond It

Posted Wed, 01/25/2012 by michael

not broken

The point is maintaining relationship – not connecting something that is broken.

The terms bonding and attachment imply separation, to bond, connect, glue together separate parts. Life is relationship. We are never separate, except in our minds.

We are the light, the air, the water, the nutrients, the heat, the vibration, gravity, ever-changing movement and much more. The human body and brain is defined by the environment. Each mirrors the other. But we forget. The deeper reality and challenge is to prevent this ongoing, dynamic and reciprocal connection from being broken.

Joseph Chilton Pearce and I were exploring the root cause of our social and political calamity. Joe lamented that nature’s agenda during pregnancy, birth and the sensitive postnatal period – doesn’t happen. What could be fails to unfold. ‘Houston, we have a problem.’ See: http://ttfuture.org/files/2/members/esa_jcp_biology_culture.pdf

The Judicial-Moral Mind: An appeal to the American Academy of Pediatrics

The Morality of Pain and Pleasure in human relationships defines the Morality of Human Behavior, which is forged during early life experiences. Aristotle (c.350 B.C.) appreciated the reciprocal relationship between pleasure and pain, and recognized that a compulsive search for bodily pleasure originates from a state of bodily discomfort and pain: ‘the care of the body ought to precede that of the soul." (Politica); and "Therefore, the highest good is some sort of pleasure, despite the fact that most pleasures are bad, and, if you like, bad in the unqualified sense of the word." (Nichomachean Ethics, Book 7).

The genital mutilation of children (Circumcision, male and female) is the first moral lesson taught our children: Pain (Violence) is a moral good that is carried throughout life. Moses Maimonides' in The Guide of the Perplexed (circa 1190) stated. “The bodily pain caused to that member is the real purpose of circumcision” (III: 49) and prepares the infant/child for a life of violence and helps define a culture of violence—a Crime Against Humanity. http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/Levy1945.html
http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/Our_Two_Cultural_Brains.pdf

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) will hold its 2011 National Conference & Exhibition from October 15-18, 2001 at the Boston Convention & Exhibition Center. It is timely and urgent that at this meeting the AAP addresses the genital mutilation of children, as an act of torture and mutilation, which is a Crime Against Humanity.

Dr. Judith Palfrey, M.D., Past President, American Academy of Pediatrics was compelled to renounce the AAP Bioethics Committee’s policy statement on Ritual Cutting of Female Minors with the following statement: ”The AAP does not endorse the practice of offering a "clitoral nick”. This minimal pinprick is forbidden under federal law…” (17 May 2010).
http://mgmbill.org/usfgmlaw.htm
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/125/5/1088.full/reply#pediatrics_el_50189

Judge J. Flaherty (1978). In The Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Civil Division. McFall v Shimp, stated in his OPINION: "Forceable extraction of living body tissue causes revulsion to the judicial mind. Such would raise the spectre of the swastika and the Inquisition, reminiscent of the horrors this portends... An Order will be entered denying the request for a preliminary injunction”;; and I would add the Moral Mind. http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/McFall_v_Shimp.pdf

This is particularly the case when the primary beneficiary are other children, e.g. in Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) that affects only about 2% of the population of male newborns and where better and safer treatments are available; and where surgery has never been historically demonstrated to control for infectious diseases, e.g. HIV/AIDS.

A letter has been written to Lewis R. First, M.D., Editor, PEDIATRICS (1 October 2011) requesting his support in the education of the Pediatric Community concerning these issues by bringing attention to Pediatricians the PETITION TO THE WORLD COURT, THE HAGUE.

This letter to Dr. First and the PETITION TO THE WORLD COURT, THE HAGUE is attached for review by the Pediatric Community.

Click HERE.

beyond reason

We are attracted to experiences that feel good and turn away from those that hurt, pleasure and pain. Both are driven by millions of years of natural intelligence.

Affectionate touch, eyes that assure care and trust, warm cuddling, the life giving sensation of mother’s breast, being held when frightened, all the experiences we call nurturing involve pleasure. Like a beautiful flower, delicate and radiating, the female body percolates with pleasurable possibilities. Life’s continuity depends on pleasure. See Sex At Dawn.

Puberty transforms pleasure into reproductive sexuality, still deeply rooted in nurturing, but with a twist. The game changes. Clearly the enchantment of female pleasure is something few males can resist, which is, after all, nature’s intelligent design.

Being the source of pleasure the value and importance of the female body’s pleasure potential increases, at least in the often sensory deprived male imagination. Anything that valuable, like gold, becomes a commodity to be possessed and controlled. Doing so brings social power. The stakes are indeed high.

Anything that brings pleasure, whether it is substances or sex - individuals, governments and political-religious organizations step up to the gaming table and play their controlling hand. They make up rules, pass laws, boast of divine revelation, and have for centuries to possess and control - pleasure.

It is well know, to control one’s currency is to control its people, and controlling pleasure, in this regard, is worth its weight on gold. Ask the Mafia, similar in the way it profits from pleasure as the church and governments. No? Just glance at the 300 year Catholic Spanish Inquisition with its witch hunts and how many of its torturous techniques were sadistic sexual pervasions.

One of the easiest ways to control the enchantment and political power of pleasure, and therefore entire populations, is to reduce its potency. Locate the most sensitive pleasure producing tissues and remove it, claiming of course that an old bearded man seated on his cloud throne demanded so. Do this over and over and like any Big Lie (referring to Joseph Goebbels’s the German Reich Minister of Propaganda famous remark), becomes the truth.

Like Shakespeare’s ‘rose’ a lie, be it by the church, the government, Fox or the Wall Street Journal, is still a lie. It is well documented. Female and male circumcision was invented to reduce and therefore control pleasure and this unnatural and completely unnecessary procedure is forced. Like hooded prisoners at Guantanamo or the Inquisition, young girls and boys by the millions are held down by force, their legs spread and the most sensitive tissues, that nature evolved over millions of years is cut off, in most cases inflecting unbearable pain.

James W. Prescott, PhD, argues that circumcision, female and male, is a form or torture, illegal, demanding equal protection under 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. Jim cites The General Assembly of the United Nations on December 10, 1948 that adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, specifically Article 5: "No one shall be subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

Jim’s position is clear and lucid as the arguments raised by Joseph Chilton Pearce in The Death of Religion and Rebirth of Spirit, and by Sam Harris in End of Faith, both startling analyses of the clash of faith and reason in the modern world.

Pleasure is not nearly as demonic as is the behavior of those who seek power by controlling and profiting from it.

See more…

Michael Mendizza

dna remembers

“The addict’s reliance on the drug to reawaken her dulled feelings is no adolescent caprice.
The dullness is itself the consequence of an emotional malfunction not of her making.”

Gabor Mate, MD, Author,
In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts, Close Encounters with Addiction

More on Pleasure, Pain and the Developing Brain

The development of each new human being involves the complete evolutionary process of life on the planet. Native traditions recognize and honor this fact. Western civilization, driven by an anti-feminine passion for male intellect does not, thus the classic mind-body split. One self-world view nurtures the deep ecology that we are, the other attempts to dominate and control nature, including our own.

In each of us is the entire process of creation, what Joseph Chilton Pearce calls Evolution’s End. Each stage of development anticipates the past and creates the necessary foundation for the next unknowable leap forward to unfold. The developing fetus in the liquid world of the womb, for example, has no use for lungs and yet creates lungs anticipating an oxygenated environment it ‘knows’ nothing about. The entire spectrum of human development implies this unfolding anticipation and unknowable expectation.

bonding

What is bonding, the very heart of species survival or a nice sentiment? Are the experiences we call bonding or attachment the same today as 100 years ago, before commercial interests made it shameful to breastfeed, fetal monitors and surgical-cesarean births? What is the relationship between nurturing and bonding? Do stronger bonds result in greater nurturing? Is reduced bonding a prescription for generational cycles of neglect and abuse? Critical questions are being raised by visionaries in the field of human development. What are the consequences of interfering with bonding and nature’s expectation for nurturing?

Responding to Touch the Future and National Institute for PLAY’s important PLAY SCIENCE DVD:

Creative play is the foundation for social-political freedom and liberty which is not possible when abnormal brain development is induces by a failure of affcctional bonding in the maternal-infant –child relationship.

Depression, stereotypical rocking behaviors and compulsive stimulus-seeking behaviors, all produced by sensory deprivation to the developing brain that is induced by failed maternal-infant/child affectional bonding, robs the developing offspring of the capacity to engage in touching and body movement that is essential for creative/spontaneous play; and to later development of behaviors associated with personal freedom and liberty.

Violence, particularly child abuse, is another destructive consequence of these early life experiences that prevents the development of creative/spontaneous play, which is the foundation for social-political freedom and liberty.

Figure 1, a photo montage, illustrates the pathological emotional behaviors induced by early
deprivation of physical affection. Figure

2 illustrates the avoidance of physical contact with other animals and humans in mother-deprived monkeys; and positive affectional behaviors in monkeys reared with their mothers.

Table 1 presents how our Two Cultural Brains are formedby Pain and Pleasure, which determines the kind of Culture we become.

Explore the full essay

"There is a good principle that created order, light and man; and a
bad principle that created chaos, darkness and woman."
Pythagoras (circa 582-507 B.C.)

(In Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 1949/2009).
Gender Inequality has existed ever since human history has been written. Pythagoras has given a moral definition of being male and female that has set humanity and its civilizations on a collision course with the extinction of Homo sapiens. No species on this planet is as violent toward its females and her offspring than Homo sapiens.

There is not a theistic religion on this planet that has affirmed the full equality of the feminine with the masculine, which has set in stone the perpetration of violence against women and her children. Prescott (1989,1995ab) has reviewed this history in essays:

Genital Pain vs. Genital Pleasure: Why The One and Not The Other? “Violence Against Women: Philosophical and Religious Foundations of Gender Morality”; “OPINION: The challenge: achieve gender equality”; and “A Proposed “Bodily Sovereignty” Amendment To The U.S. Constitution”.

http://www.violence.de/prescott/truthseeker/genpl.html
http://www.violence.de/prescott/women/article.html
http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/Gender.pdf
http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/Bodily_Sovereignty_Amendment.pdf

Simone de Beauvoirʼs The Second Sex originally published in France (1949) and recently reprinted in a new translation by Alfred A. Knopf (2009) is considered the authoritative translation of her work and the leading intellectual document of the feminist cultural movement. It is the foundation for restoring full equality between man and woman that was lost with the passing of the hunter-gathers some 8,000-10,000 years ago.

A few quotations The Second Sex:

“What is a woman?” (p.5).

“The female is female by virtue of a certain lack of qualities”, Aristotle said. “We should regard women’s nature as suffering from natural defectiveness.” And Saint Thomas in his turn decreed that woman was an “incomplete man,” an “incidental” being” (p.5).

“Humanity is male, and man defines woman not in herself, but in relation to himself; she is not considered an autonomous being. (p.5).

“He is the Subject, he is the Absolute. She is the Other.3 “ (p.6)

“Why do women not contest male sovereignty?” (p.7)

Additional commentary HERE.

13 February 2011

Hi Jim,
Just want to make sure you saw this study by http://linlab.med.nyu.edu/members.html Dayu Lin at New York University that corroborates your own studies and the work you have been doing for over four decades. Here is the Nature summary of the study: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v470/n7333/full/nature09736.html

Excerpt:
Immediate early gene analysis and single unit recordings from VMHvl during social interactions reveal overlapping but distinct neuronal subpopulations involved in fighting and mating. Neurons activated during attack are inhibited during mating, suggesting a potential neural substrate for competition between these opponent social behaviours.

"The mating circuit acts like a gate on the aggression circuit and actively suppresses nearby fighting neurons when there is a potential mate around," says Lin.

Peace through pleasure
Susan M. Block, Ph.D.

Thanks Susan for the reference. The reciprocal inhibitory relationship between Pain and Pleasure and Peace and Violence have been known for a long time. It is great to know that “mating circuits” actively suppress “nearby fighting neurons” in the mouse brain.

The scientific history of this relationship goes back to the 1950s with the studies of Robert G. Heath, M.D., Sc.D. at Columbia University and continued as Chairman, Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Tulane University Medical School. His edited 1964 textbook The Role of Pleasure In Behavior is a classic in the field.

More
James W. Prescott, Ph.D.

America is a Culture of Violence. Assassination of our political leaders has a long
history in this nation. Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Martin
Luther King, Jr. are in recent memory of this history and now we must add liberal
Democratic Representative Gabrielle Gifford, 8th District, Arizona, as a potential victim.
It is of more than passing interest that the victims of these assassinations represent the
liberal wing of America political thought and action. Questions must be raised as to the
origins of political/social conservatism in the genesis of these assassinations. On the
world scene we have Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Benito Mussolini, Emperor Hirohito and
the variety of dictators throughout Latin America, Asia, Africa and the Middle East—all
strove to subject “We, the People” to government tyranny.

An “agonizing reappraisal” is needed to evaluate why homo sapiens is the most violent
and destructive primate on this planet; why religious warfare has dominated the socialpolitical
landscape of home sapiens; why “liberals” are rarely assassins which is
occupied primarily by those of authoritarian/conservative social/political ideology.
In pursing the investigation of the attempted assassination of Representative Gifford we
need to ask why her and not Republican Senator Jon Kyle of Arizona, a far more
significant and powerful political conservative figure than liberal Democrat
Representative Gifford, was not targeted for assassination.
Full Text Found HERE

It is matter of record that Sarah Palin has evoked many images, verbal rhetoric and
graphic visual imagery of violence in her political speeches and campaigns. Her use of
the Crosshairs against her political opponents that is represented in the following
Figure 1 that targets liberal political Districts are illustrative of this effort. Crosshairs
mean one thing—to kill- and the next step is pulling the trigger. This use of violent words
and visual imagery can only stoke the fire of violent political opposition, which we see in
the attempted assassination of Representative Gifford, one of the Districts targeted for
assassination.

E. J. Dionne Jr., in a Washington Post Op-Ed piece (1.10.11), quoted Representative
Giffords: "We're on Sarah Palin's targeted list," she said, "but the thing is that the way
she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do
that, they've got to realize there's consequences to that action." That consequence was
pulling the trigger.

“Mother Grizzly” is another example of the use of violent imagery in conveying a political
message by Sarah Palin.

MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS
A Washington Post story (1.9.11) on the shooting reported: “On YouTube, Loughner's
profile listed Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels's "The Communist Manifesto" and Adolf
Hitler's "Mein Kampf" among his favorite books”, which provides an obvious motivational
linkage for the shooter in Tucson, AZ, via the neocortical cognitive brain.

There are, however, other motivational factors that are rooted in early life experiences of
infancy, childhood and adolescence, which form the subcortical emotional, social,
sexual brain that is first in evolution and development, which need to be investigated.

Studies have documented that nurturing; non-violent tribal cultures are characterized by
high maternal-infant/child affectional bonding with support of sexual affectional
relationships in youth and are predominately matrilineal/matrilocal in nature. The
opposite non-nurturing relationships were found to characterize the violent, warfare
cultures that were predominately patrilineal/patrilocal cultures.

Violence and Pleasure Profiles
The reciprocal relationship of violence and pleasure holds true in modern industrial
nations as well as primitive societies. This theory was tested by means of a
questionnaire given to 96 college students (average age: 19). The results showed that
students who have relatively negative attitudes toward sexual pleasure tend to favor
harsh punishment for children and to believe that violence is necessary to solve
problems. The students rated a series of statements on a scale of 1 to 6, where 1
indicated strong agreement and 6 strong disagreement. Through a statistical technique
(factor analysis), a personality profile of the violent person was developed. Table 5
(from Prescott, J.W. (1975) Body Pleasure and the Origins of Violence) shows the
degree of relationship among the various statements, which reflect social and moral
values. The figures at left, known as 'loadings,' are treated like correlation coefficients.
They indicate the strength that each variable contributes to the overall personality profile
of the respondents. Values range from -1.0 to +1.0.

It can be seen that Political Conservatism has a loading of .82, which defines this
Factor 1, and accounts for 66.6% of the common relationships in this questionnaire. If
you Agree with one statement you are likely to agree with the other statements on this
questionnaire with the probability associated with the numeric figure on the left.
Similarly, for Disagreement.

This Profile has grouped the Questions into four categories: 1) Violence Approved; 2)
Physical Pleasure Condemned; 4) Alcohol and Drugs Rated Higher Than Sex; and 4)
Political Conservatism.

This Prescott Index of Conservatism can be completed by Sarah Palin and all Politicians
to determine the accuracy of this Profile of Political Conservatism and the moral
values that give it structure and function.

Political Conservatism and Liberalism is more than just a neocortical cognitive event but
whose structure and function is deeply rooted in early life experiences of Pain and
Pleasure that form the developing brain for Peace or Violence. Table 2 summarizes our
Two Cultural Brains that are formed by whether Pain or Pleasure is encoded in the
subcortical Limbic-Emotional-Social-Sexual Brain and the Neocortical Cognitive
Thinking Brain during early development—the formative periods of brain-behavioral
development.

America has created its own “Culture of Violence”, which has its many roots that are
shared by the Cultures of the World. The time is long overdue to transform our Cultures
of Violence into Cultures of Peace. Calls for civility and Words alone cannot resolve
millennia of violence that the history of human violence and treaties affirms.

References
Dionne Jr, E.J. (2011). Gabby Giffords, a tragic prophet. The Washington Post.
January 10. Washington, D.C.

Fahrenthold, D.A. and Williams, C. (2011). 22-year-0ld suspect appears to have left
trail of bizarre Internet postings. The Washington Post. 9 January, Washington
D.C.

Prescott, J.W. (1975) Body Pleasure and the Origins of Violence. The Futurist April.
Reprinted: The Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists (1975) November.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/bulletin/article.html

Prescott, J.W. (l979): Deprivation of physical affection as a primary process in the
development of physical violence. In. Child Abuse and Violence (Gil, D. G.,
Ed). AMS Press New York pp 66-137.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/IM_BF_H.pdf

Prescott, J.W. (1989). Profiles of Affectionate (Peaceful) v Non-Affectionate (Violent)
Tribal Cultures. The Truth Seeker July/August.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/Profiles_Peaceful_v_Violent.pdf

Prescott, J.W. (l990): Affectional bonding for the prevention of violent behaviors:
Neurobiological, Psychological and Religious/Spiritual Determinants. In. Violent
Behavior Vol. I: Assessment and Intervention. (L.J. Hertzberg, et. al., Eds).
PMA Publishing NY pp. 110-142.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/Violent_Behavior_1990.pdf

Prescott, J.W. (1995). Violence Against Women: Philosophical and Religious
Foundations of Gender Morality. New Perspectives. (March/April). Hemet,
CA http://www.violence.de/prescott/women/article.html

Prescott, J.W. (1996). The Origins of Human Love and Viole
http://www.violence.de/prescott/pppj/article.html

Prescott, J.W. (2001). Along the Evolutionary Biological Trail. Book Review: Mother
Nature: A History of Mothers, Infants, and Natural Selection (S.H. Hrdy).
Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health 15(3): 225- 232.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/reviews/hrdy.html

Prescott, J.W. (2001). Only More Mother-Infant Bonding Can Prevent Cycles of
Violence. Cerebrum 3(1) Winter. Lt.Ed (re, Teicher, M.R.: Wounds That Time
Won't Heal: The Neurobiology of Child Abuse, Cerebrum, 2001 3(1).
http://www.violence.de/prescott/reviews/cerebrum.doc

Prescott, J.W. (2002). How Culture Shapes The Developing Brain and The Future of
Humanity. Touch the Future Newsletter. Spring Prescott, J.W. (2003).
http://www.violence.de/prescott/ttf/cultbrain.pdf

Prescott (2003). Our Two Cultural Brains: Neurointegrative and
Neurodissociative Formed By Pain and Pleasure From Early Life Experiences
Encoded in the Developing Brain.
http://www.violence.de/prescott/letters/Our_Two_Cultural_Brains.pdf

Prescott, J.W. (2005): Prevention Or Therapy And The Politics of Trust: Inspiring a New
Human Agenda. Psychotherapy and Politics International. 3(3): 194-211 John
Wiley & Sons.
http:/www.interscience.wiley.com http://www.violence.de/prescott/politicsrust.
pdf
Prescott, J.W. (2010). Genital Mutilation of Children Is Torture. E-letter to the American
Academy of Pediatrics protesting the position of the AAP Committee On
Bioethics that supported female genital cutting (FGC) 29 April.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/eletters/peds.2010-0187v1#50189
Prescott, J.W. (2010). Infant/child homicide, breastfeeding bonding and parental care.
E-mail letter to American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statement on Child
Fatality Review: Investigation and Review of Unexpected Infant and Child
Deaths 22 September 2010 Pediatrics 104: 1158-1160
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org//cgi/content/abstract/126/3/592


10 January 2011

See Attached PDF for Tables and addational references.

Rachel wrote:
I have a question around bonding/brain/skin-to-skin.  I have a 7 week old, that I am attachment parenting...carrying in arms, co sleeping etc.  I spent a lot of the first 4- days with skin to skin, however since then hardly any skin to skin (as it is winter and I have two other children so it's not convenient.)  Can you give me some information around whether the skin to skin I did for the majority of the first 4-5 days was sufficient for optimal brain development/bonding or whether I should still be doing this?  Thank you. LOVE the website and the work you are all doing - it's the best thing for the world!

Syndicate content